Discussion with Mr. Fang Zhouzi

 Fang: Chinese medicine is a pseudo-science you of how we should face the
: Fang
far as I know, no single medicine has been fully adopted such a strict clinical trials, and modern medicine (also known Some even shouted to me on the Internet. I do not believe there are objections to the interests of the readers are under threat of Chinese medicine practitioners, some may belong to personally experienced the benefits of Chinese medicine or for the national feelings of people believe in the myth of Chinese medicine . For the former, I do not feel the need to convince them to face-lift, in fact, impossible, and for the latter, I think we should let them know some of the basic medical science concepts and methods, more sober, rational treatment of medicine.
we first traditional Chinese medicine theory and Chinese medicine should be (and acupuncture and other traditional therapies) separated. TCM theory incompatible with modern science, although there are many people dream that one day will be included in traditional Chinese medicine theory scientific system, even with to save the modern medicine, but that is just an illusion, I do not think it is possible. the world's various nations (including Western National) in history have had their own set of medical theories, they have been excluded scientific system, we have no reason to believe that their nation's traditional medicine would be an exception. Science has no borders, not belong to a specific nation.
but denied that the scientific theory of Chinese medicine, Chinese medicine does not mean total rejection. Some therapies like Chinese traditional therapies, like other nations, may have its value, it is worth mining methods with modern medical research. I can not here a comprehensive medical evaluation of the right and wrong, and would just like to talk about How to treat and many ordinary readers have a direct bearing on medicine. for ordinary readers, they are more concerned about whether the health care system is not a science, but some kind of therapy, drugs are effective or toxic side effects.
medium A common reason for medical defense is that it is experience may be effective, but also very limited. the experience of word of mouth is often unreliable, containing false, exaggerated, or intentionally or unintentionally, were screened (only pay attention to the neglect of the successful cases of failure cases). efficacy of many diseases can not be determined through experience and exploration.
medical history in the medical case, talked about what prescriptions they once cured a patient, the patient described in the article how they benefit from their own experiences of a drug, these It seems no value in modern medicine, because the drug, the efficacy of therapy, the case is not that convincing. a patient of a drug after the patient ate well, really does not mean that drugs played a role in that . It may be self-healing (many diseases can also be self-healing did not take medication), may be the result of psychological suggestion (many diseases, a considerable portion of non-medicated patients to eat a may even be misdiagnosed, the patient had no disease. Therefore, to determine the efficacy of a drug must be done a lot of clinical trials can only be determined after the statistics. and the double-blind clinical trials must be taken to approach that in the testing process The patient I do not know what to eat, like the appearance of drug-drug or placebo, to exclude the role of psychological suggestion; attending physician does not know which patients to eat the drug or placebo, in order to avoid subjective bias when judging efficacy. What Who ate the drugs, who eat a placebo control by a third party, open only in the final statistical effect. As far as I know, no single medicine has been fully adopted such a strict clinical trials, and modern medicine (also known , toxic drugs, may also be found by experience, but the side effects of those shown to be a long time to chronic toxicity, such as drug caused cancer, liver disease, kidney disease, cardiovascular disease, their experience is impossible to find, we must rely on animal experiments, clinical trials, epidemiological surveys to find out. TCM although there are What kind of damage caused by basically nothing. modern drugs are detailed in the specification side effects, and I had taken several common Chinese medicines, have made no mention of side effects, most in the . gentian vent pill can cause liver failure, only a well-known example, in fact, there are many Pharmacopoeia records child. I give another example, U.S. law banned the import of products containing ingredients of rare animals, the U.S. Fish end Wildlife Department forensic laboratory in the mid-90s claiming to contain a sample of 12 species of tiger bone, rhino horn and the medicine pills did not detect these components, only to discover that these toxic elements of proprietary Chinese medicines by high levels of mercury and arsenic was amazing, not take it. which is due to rumors that the highest levels to Liu Hai-juo Angongniuhuang Pill (also known as the bezoar An Gong Wan). Many Chinese tonic contain heavy metals, long-term use can lead to chronic heavy metal poisoning. The irony is that someone in the service of the Chinese tonic and feel Fire common sense, do not believe in all kinds of advertising, rumors, not only can spend less money wasted, but also allows your body to suffer less crime. Otherwise, the blind after taking the medicine caused irreversible chronic poisoning to too late. (< br> Zou Satsuki
Discussion
split with Mr. Fang Zhouzi fresh, and very naive. due to the shallow talent thin books, reading is limited, so far, access to the books since ancient times, have not found a scholar, dare easy to deny Chinese medicine theory and Chinese medicine, I am for your courage and surprised!
Maybe you studied the natural sciences? Maybe you studied Western medicine? could read some Chinese books and studied Chinese medicine theory, have explored the theory of Chinese medicine combined with modern science, but how also with less together, and thus a doubt! to easily down the conclusion! Whether you are learning something, I think you have not learned master, has not really understand the true traditional Chinese medicine theory sings! So grass The next commander of a that should not be put in; Western opposition to the two medical discussion, the discussion should avoid weaknesses of their development, to sort out their respective advantages together; combine to make it more perfect in the development of services for human health.
any he was a medical methods has advantages and disadvantages, has his limitations, we can not only see his so-called lack of, or that some drug companies of non-normal behavior, and to blame the drug fraud the scope of the theoretical system! to make a total negation of the conclusion, and that too is too narrow, and the line and go to school, this view itself is not science, not a realistic view of things, let alone a just and fair!
the outset that the production of traditional Chinese medicine theory: He was two thousand years ago, the theory of the feudal society and its representatives to do the manifestation of ideology, the application of the method of taking the class as compared to illustrate the laws of nature and the human body in various organs of the name; and operation rules, to explain the physiological activities; pathological changes.
written by the famous Eastern Han Dynasty Zhongjing The ; Differential Treatment should be equivalent to a result of human induced; illness caused appropriate. how can this be said to be to a good social effect. If it is unscientific, no clinical long natural eliminated by the society. natural science to explain, or explain do not understand that it is the ?
the same as your own, you are now an accomplished scholar, and then you put your infant at the age of 7-8, the person you say nothing, right?
we can not results of modern science to evaluate the theoretical system of over two thousand years and culture, as not Until now, why should we spend so much human material and financial resources in the medical establishment so much it? professors in these schools are ; idiot said, do not know if you noticed, in the mid 80s of last century, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Professor Zhu Zhong-wing, through the thousands of scientific experiments to prove that the TCM theory of drugs (so-called called in strict compliance with the procedures of pharmaceutical products, and made a LD50 test, pharmacological; toxicological experiment, animal experiments, clinical trials, what single-blind method; double-blind experiments have been, achieved great success, human health have made outstanding contributions. LD50 test the drug by more than 300 times its normal volume for the human body without toxic effects.
also proved its efficacy for clinical use, once a patient suffering from purulent tonsils, continuous using a three-day .
This is not just the patients medical history, I have access to each of more than 18,000 such patients, efficacy is yes, practice is the sole criterion for testing truth, which fully proved that the efficacy of traditional Chinese medicine. < br> There Ussuri River Pharmaceutical R & D Welcome, efficacy is in the affirmative. these are
say that no value, because the drug, the efficacy of therapy, the case is not that convincing. a patient of a drug after the patient ate well, does not mean that is really the kind of drugs played a role. It may be self-healing (did not take medicine many diseases can also be self-healing), may be the psychological implications of the results (a significant portion of many diseases, a non-medicated patients to eat a had no disease. people, if you go thinking this, then you are Newton, you're Madame Curie, and the ancient physician who is better than you so much!
do not know you is not been engaged in clinical, modern doctors to write When the paper is to have a certain number of records, grouped by double-blind, they do it by starting topic is refined and tested, a little better than papers in other disciplines difference!
me to say something to you since l r more of the problem.
example, a patient suffering from a is to use hormones and vitamin B1 and vitamin B12, for the treatment, you do not have statistics on the cure rate using this method of treatment is how much? without any way treated him to tell you that this disease, using the methods of acupuncture over 90% cure rate, and I'm with you bet!! you dare to do?
Is there such a talk to you again, and some Chinese enterprises to use the Qiqihar Heilongjiang Province, the second pharmaceutical ?
repeat that look br> this matter is clear is that some manufacturers of fraud is for the profiteers are, how can you say to the Chinese medicine is not it?
l Angongniuhuang Xu
l lr contain many heavy metals in Chinese tonic , long-term use can lead to chronic heavy metal poisoning. r The drug is not long-term use, please take a look at
TCM strengths, should complement each other, the common development of Integrative Medicine, for human health services.
me give an example, the same patient, one femur 1 / 3 of patients with fractures, the Western surgical treatment, and use a nail, steel, wire and other materials, the operation was successful, reaching the anatomic reduction, however, treatment, training of 5 months has not come down to earth.
the patient two years later, tibia 1 / 3 fracture, after the film X-ray diagnosis, the use of traditional Chinese medicine manual reduction, a small splint fixation, oral medicine bone Dan l r, the results of treatment of 81 days to work.
Mr. Mariner, to see traditional Chinese medicine, Chinese medicine is the we must analyze the reading, do not poison ah!